Houston Rejects Irrational Recycling Fad

Source of graph: online version of the NYT article quoted and cited below.
(p. A13) HOUSTON -- While most large American cities have started ambitious recycling programs that have sharply reduced the amount of trash bound for landfills, Houston has not.
. . .
Landfill costs here are cheap. The city's sprawling, no-zoning layout makes collection expensive, and there is little public support for the kind of effort it takes to sort glass, paper and plastics. And there appears to be even less for placing fees on excess trash.
"We have an independent streak that rebels against mandates or anything that seems trendy or hyped up," said Mayor Bill White, . . .
For the full story, see:
(Note: ellipses added.)
Comments
As practiced in my small town, recycling is not only an irrational fad but a feel-good farce as well.
The first thing I noticed when recycling was made the rule here was that now we had three trucks going through town, stopping at every house once a week. With the old system, only one truck was needed. I asked the city council about the added use of fuel, pollution, danger to kids, etc. They had no answer but the 'recycling was the future'.
One afternoon I met the cat that drove one of the recycling trucks in a local bar. I asked him where he took his load of plastic and glass (the other recycling truck was for paper and cardboard). His answer: "I take it to the landfill and dump it, same as the regular garbage truck."
Complaints about this dishonest business were answered by assertions that we needed to be 'trained' to sort out our trash so that we would comply when 'real recycling' became feasible.
I guess that was what they meant when they said "recycling was the future."
Posted by: ptg
|
April 21, 2009 6:19 AM
Posted by: Aaron
|
April 21, 2009 11:13 AM
Posted by: Mark Laniak
|
April 28, 2009 9:56 PM